Technical reference diagram
FIG · 14 CNC materials compared on strength and machinability — the base for selection.

The 7 dimensions that drive material choice.

Material selection for CNC parts is a constrained optimization — you're minimizing cost while meeting seven performance requirements. For most parts, only 2–3 of these actually constrain the choice. Identify yours first, then pick the cheapest material that satisfies them.

DimensionWhat it meansWhen it drives the choice
1. StrengthYield, ultimate, fatigueLoad-bearing structural parts
2. StiffnessYoung's modulusPrecision frames, optical mounts
3. WeightDensityAerospace, motorsport, handheld
4. Corrosion resistanceEnvironmental durabilityMarine, medical, food, outdoor
5. TemperatureService and cycling rangeEngines, furnaces, cryogenic
6. Electrical/thermalConductivityHeat sinks, bus bars, electrodes
7. ManufacturabilityMachinability, weldabilityAlways — affects cost directly
Rule of thumb: If you can only identify one constraint for your part, the default material is 6061-T6 aluminum for structural parts or 304 stainless for wet/chemical exposure. About 70% of our RFQs end up in one of these two.

Starting defaults by use case.

Use caseDefault materialUpgrade if...
Structural bracket / housing6061-T6 aluminumLoad limited → 7075-T6
Jig / fixture plateA2 or 4140 steelWear critical → D2 or tool steel
Food / medical wet contact304 stainlessChloride → 316L
Marine hardware316L stainlessExtreme → titanium Grade 5
Aerospace structural7075-T6 aluminumTemp > 150°C → titanium or 718
Engine hot sectionInconel 718Temp > 700°C → Waspaloy
Heat sink / electronic6063 or C110 copperThermal & structural → AlSiC
Machined prototype (form only)6061 or DelrinFinal material is spec'd
Electrical contactC110 copper or brassSpring needed → beryllium copper
Mold core / insertP20 or H13 steelCorrosive resin → 420 SS hardened
Shaft / bushing1045 or 4140 steelCorrosion → 17-4 PH SS
Bearing / gear4340 or 8620 steelWear critical → tool steel + HT

When to pick aluminum — 60% of parts.

Aluminum is the default CNC material because it combines low density, good machinability, corrosion resistance, and reasonable cost. Most brackets, housings, enclosures, mounts, and structural frames should start as aluminum and only move up if there's a specific reason.

  • 6061-T6 — the baseline. Good strength (276 MPa yield), excellent weldability, anodizes cleanly. Use for 80% of aluminum parts. See full spec →
  • 7075-T6 — when 6061 is strength-limited. Yield 503 MPa, but 2.5× the material cost, slightly lower corrosion resistance. See full spec →
  • 5052-H32 — sheet-forming grade. Excellent corrosion resistance (marine-rated), lower strength than 6061. Mostly for bent/formed enclosures.
  • 2024-T3 — aircraft-skin grade. Similar strength to 7075 but better fatigue resistance. Poor weldability, poor corrosion (usually clad).
  • 6063 — extruded heat-sink grade. Better surface finish in anodizing, lower strength than 6061.

When to pick carbon or alloy steel.

Steel comes in when you need strength at 3–4× the density of aluminum and low cost. Heat-treatable alloy steels are the default for shafts, gears, and load-bearing machine parts. Plain carbon steels are for jigs, fixtures, and non-corrosive structural use.

  • 1018 mild steel — lowest cost, easy to machine, easy to weld. Use for non-heat-treated brackets, fixtures, and jigs. No corrosion resistance — paint or plate.
  • 1045 medium carbon — can be flame-hardened on surfaces. Used for shafts, keys, and gears in non-corrosive service.
  • 4140 (42CrMo4) — the default alloy steel. Heat-treatable to ~45 HRC. Used for shafts, connecting rods, tooling bodies, and anything that sees cyclic load.
  • 4340 — 4140 with more nickel. Better impact toughness; use when 4140 is underperforming in fatigue. More expensive.
  • A2 / D2 tool steel — air-hardening, very wear resistant. For dies, punches, stamping tools, wear plates.

When to pick stainless steel.

Stainless is the answer whenever moisture, washdown, food, blood, or mild chemicals are involved. It's 2–3× harder to machine than aluminum, so expect 30–80% higher part cost for the same geometry.

  • 303 — free-machining austenitic. Has sulfur added for cleaner chips; use for turned parts in mild environments. Avoid if corrosion is critical or if welding is needed.
  • 304 / 304L — general-purpose stainless. Good corrosion in food, beverage, pharmaceutical, and most outdoor environments. See full spec →
  • 316 / 316L — added molybdenum gives chloride resistance. Use for marine, coastal outdoor, and all sour-service environments. See full spec →
  • 17-4 PH — precipitation-hardening. Can be aged to ~1200 MPa yield. Used where high strength + corrosion are both required (aerospace fasteners, pump shafts).
  • 420 — martensitic. Hardens to 50+ HRC. Used for cutlery, surgical instruments, corrosion-resistant dies.

When to pick titanium.

Titanium's sweet spot is when you need stainless-equivalent corrosion resistance but at half the density. It's 4–6× more expensive than stainless and harder to machine, so it shouldn't be a default — but it's excellent for weight-critical, biocompatible, or chloride-aggressive applications.

  • Grade 2 (commercially pure) — low-strength titanium. Best formability and corrosion resistance. Used for chemical process parts, marine heat exchangers, and biocompatible non-structural devices.
  • Grade 5 (Ti-6Al-4V) — the titanium workhorse. Yield 830 MPa, biocompatible, weldable. Used for aerospace structural parts, orthopedic implants, race bike components. See full spec →
  • Grade 23 (Ti-6Al-4V ELI) — extra-low interstitial. The medical-implant version of Grade 5. Slightly lower strength but better toughness and fracture resistance.

When to pick nickel alloys.

Nickel superalloys earn their cost when you need strength at temperature above 500°C, or aggressive corrosion resistance in oil/gas service. Expensive to buy and machine — budget 8–12× the aluminum equivalent.

  • Inconel 625 — solid-solution-strengthened. Best weldability, service to 980°C. Used for chemical process vessels, exhaust components, subsea manifolds.
  • Inconel 718 — precipitation-hardened. 1240 MPa yield in aged condition, service to 650°C. The dominant alloy for aerospace hot-section parts and O&G downhole. See full spec →
  • Hastelloy C-276 — extreme chloride and acid resistance. Used in chemical plants, chlor-alkali, wet FGD scrubbers.
  • Monel 400 / K-500 — nickel-copper. Best choice for seawater service at moderate temps.

When to pick copper or brass.

Copper alloys win when electrical or thermal conductivity is the primary requirement, or when you need non-sparking / non-magnetic behavior.

  • C110 (OFHC copper) — pure copper, best conductivity. Used for bus bars, electrodes, heat sinks, RF components.
  • C360 free-machining brass — the fastest-machining metal. Used for fittings, fasteners, connectors, small electrical components. See full spec →
  • C260 cartridge brass — drawn/formed. Used for ammunition cases, deep-drawn parts.
  • Beryllium copper (C17200) — age-hardenable copper. High strength + high conductivity + non-sparking. Used for springs, electrical contacts, and oil/gas non-sparking tools.
  • Bronze (C932 / C954) — excellent bearing properties. Used for bushings, thrust washers, worm gears.

When to pick machined plastics.

Plastics machine cleanly on CNC and make sense for electrical insulators, low-load structural parts, and chemically aggressive environments where metal won't survive.

  • Delrin (POM acetal) — best general-purpose machining plastic. Low friction, dimensionally stable, easy to cut. Used for gears, bushings, small structural parts. See full spec →
  • PEEK — high-performance. 250°C continuous service, chemically resistant, biocompatible. Expensive. Used for medical implants, aerospace brackets, semiconductor wafer carriers. See full spec →
  • PTFE (Teflon) — lowest friction, chemically inert. Soft, hard to machine to tight tolerance. Used for seals, bearing surfaces, chemical process parts.
  • Ultem (PEI) — high-temp, high-strength. Flame-retardant, dimensionally stable. Used for aircraft interiors, electrical housings.
  • Nylon (PA6, PA66) — tough, wear-resistant. Absorbs moisture (swells slightly). Used for gears, wheels, bushings.
  • UHMW / HDPE — low-cost. Low friction, impact resistant. Used for wear strips, guides, non-structural parts.

Material-overspec traps we see most often.

"7075 because it's stronger" — for a part that isn't strength-limited.
We see this on drone frames, robotics brackets, and consumer product housings. Run the worst-case stress. If the factor of safety on 6061 is > 3×, you don't need 7075. Downgrading saves 40–60% on material and simplifies anodizing.
"Titanium because it looks premium."
Titanium costs 5× aluminum and machines 4× slower. If the application doesn't require biocompatibility, weight reduction, or chloride corrosion resistance, it's overspec. Use anodized 7075 or 6061 for most "looks premium" use cases — it comes out cheaper and looks similar.
"316 stainless" for indoor, dry applications.
316's chloride resistance is valuable for coastal, marine, or salt-exposed environments. For indoor dry equipment, 304 is 15–20% cheaper and performs identically in that environment. Reserve 316 for when chlorides are actually present.
"Inconel because high temperature."
Many "high temp" applications are actually under 400°C — which 17-4 PH stainless handles at 1/3 the cost of Inconel. Only move to nickel alloys above 500°C. Below that, stainless is usually the better answer.
"4140 hardened to 50 HRC" on something that doesn't need hardness.
Heat treating adds Depends on technology lead time and 20–30% cost. It also distorts parts, requiring re-machining after HT. Specify hardness only on surfaces that actually see wear or contact — use a partial hardening callout ("wear face 50 HRC, remainder as-supplied") rather than through-hardening.

Quick reference chart.

For a printable version, see our materials library index which includes all of the above with linked detailed spec pages.

MaterialDensity (g/cm³)Yield (MPa)Max service °CRel. costMachinability
6061-T6 aluminum2.702761501.0×Excellent
7075-T6 aluminum2.815031202.5×Very good
1018 mild steel7.873704000.6×Good
4140 alloy steel7.85655 (HT)5000.9×Moderate
304 stainless8.002058701.2×Moderate
316 stainless8.002058701.6×Moderate
17-4 PH stainless7.801170 (H900)3152.4×Moderate
Ti-6Al-4V4.438303506.0×Difficult
Inconel 718 (aged)8.19103565012×Very difficult
C110 copper8.94702001.8×Good
C360 brass8.503102001.5×Excellent
Delrin (POM)1.4172900.9×Excellent
PEEK1.32100250Good

Relative cost is per finished part with identical geometry (machining + material), benchmarked against 6061 = 1.0×, production quantity 100 parts.

Decision flow — how to actually pick a material

The mistake most engineers make: they start from "I need a material" and scan spec sheets. Better approach is to start from requirements and narrow down. A systematic flow:

01

Service temperature range

Define the min and max temperatures the part will see in service, including worst-case excursions. This eliminates entire material families quickly: >150°C rules out Delrin; >250°C rules out PEEK; <-100°C rules out most steels; cryogenic rules out most plastics.

02

Mechanical loads

Static load, cyclic (fatigue) load, impact load — each drives different material choices. Stainless is weaker than high-carbon steel but more forgiving in fatigue. Aluminum is weaker than steel but stiffer per weight. 7075 beats 6061 in static strength but loses badly to 6061 in stress-corrosion environments.

03

Corrosion environment

Dry indoor air — almost anything works. Humid outdoor — narrow to aluminum, stainless, or coated steel. Marine — 316 stainless, 5052/5086 aluminum, or specific corrosion-resistant alloys. Chemical exposure — consult compatibility charts specific to your chemistry.

04

Regulatory or certification needs

USP Class VI for medical, FDA for food-contact, AS9100 for aerospace, ITAR for defense. These filter the candidate list dramatically and often increase cost 30-100%. Include this constraint early — it's painful to discover late that your material choice doesn't certify.

05

Manufacturing considerations

Is the part machined? Welded? Injection-molded? 3D-printed? Different materials suit different processes. 7075 machines well, welds poorly. UHMW machines badly, welds not at all. If the production method is fixed, the material shortlist shrinks.

06

Cost and volume

Only at this point compare costs. At prototype volumes, material cost is a small fraction of part cost — optimize for properties. At production volumes, material cost dominates — small %-differences in price per kg become significant.

Material substitution patterns

When an exotic material is specified, ask if a more common substitute works:

  • 7075 → 6061: if strength margin allows. Saves 33% on material cost.
  • 316 → 304: if chloride exposure is not an issue. Saves 30%.
  • Titanium Gr5 → 17-4 PH stainless: in many structural applications, 17-4 offers similar strength at 40% the cost. Titanium wins only when weight or biocompatibility are paramount.
  • PEEK → Delrin: if service temp < 100°C and no chemical exposure. Saves 10-15× on material.
  • Inconel 718 → 17-4 PH: for non-high-temperature applications. Inconel wins above 500°C; 17-4 is adequate below that and costs 60% less.
  • Aerospace-grade aluminum (AMS spec) → commercial: if certification is not required. Same alloy, same properties, sometimes different source. AMS adds 20-40% for traceability paperwork alone.

Material DFM considerations by family

Each material family has specific design quirks that increase cost if ignored:

Aluminum alloys: thin walls under 0.8mm warp during machining. Sharp internal corners (smaller than R0.5mm) require slow-feed finishing passes. 7075 doesn't weld reliably — design in separable pieces if welding is needed.

Stainless steels: work-hardens during machining — sharp tools and adequate coolant mandatory. Post-weld passivation almost always required. For tight tolerances, account for higher thermal expansion than carbon steel.

Titanium alloys: fire hazard during machining (fine chips ignite) — requires flood coolant. Galling with steel tools requires coated tools. Stress-relief anneal often required after heavy machining. Cost 10-20× aluminum in materials alone.

Superalloys (Inconel, Hastelloy): extreme tool wear — expect 5-10× higher tooling cost. Slow cutting speeds (30-50 SFM vs 300+ for aluminum). Design for minimum material removal — every cubic millimeter matters.

Engineering plastics: dimensional instability with temperature and humidity. Plan for thermal-stress relief (anneal before or after machining) on PEEK and nylon. UHMW and other rubbery plastics can't hold tight tolerances; design for ±0.15mm.

Certification requirements that drive material choice

Beyond mechanical properties, certifications often dictate material:

  • ISO 10993 biocompatibility: required for medical devices contacting the body. Limits choices to 316L stainless, Ti-6Al-4V ELI, PEEK, and specific plastic grades. Non-certified grades of the same alloys don't qualify.
  • USP Class VI: short-term body contact plastics. PEEK, POM (Delrin 150 grade), and specific polycarbonate grades qualify. Not all grades of each plastic qualify — must be certified lot.
  • FDA food contact: indirect and direct food contact have different requirements. Stainless 304/316, PE, PP, PET, and specific Delrin grades (Delrin 150 NC010) qualify.
  • AS9100D / AMS specifications: aerospace materials require traceability from mill through fabrication. AMS-spec alloys cost 20-40% more than commercial equivalents — pay for the paperwork.
  • NORSOK M-650 / MDS: oil and gas subsea applications. Specific stainless (UNS S31803 duplex, Inconel 625, Monel 400) required. Testing and qualification requirements are extensive.
  • UL / IEC flame ratings: V-0, V-1, V-2 plastics for electrical enclosures. Specific grades and colors qualify; not interchangeable across grades.

Confirm certification requirements early. Discovering at production that your chosen material doesn't qualify for your regulated application is catastrophic — you've potentially committed to a material that must be switched, triggering requalification, tool changes, and schedule slip.

Thermal considerations beyond service temperature

Service temperature is often framed as a single number, but real thermal analysis considers:

  • Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE): differences between mated materials cause stress during temperature cycles. Aluminum 23 ×10⁻⁶/°C, steel 12 ×10⁻⁶/°C, Invar 1.5 ×10⁻⁶/°C. Mating aluminum to steel in precision fixtures can create interference or gaps across even modest temperature ranges.
  • Thermal conductivity: matters for heat sinks, cooling paths, and maintaining dimensional stability during machining. Copper 400 W/m·K (best conductor), aluminum 237, carbon steel 52, stainless 16, titanium 22, PEEK 0.25.
  • Glass transition temperature (Tg): for plastics, properties change dramatically near Tg. Delrin's Tg is around -60°C — fine for normal service. PEEK's Tg is 143°C — parts exposed above this temperature soften even though the part doesn't melt.
  • Creep: plastics deform slowly under sustained load, even below service temperature. UHMW creeps substantially. PEEK creeps minimally. Design fasteners and load-bearing plastic parts with creep in mind.

Designing against thermal effects requires integrating all four factors. A metal bracket clamping a plastic part at elevated temperature will see: different CTE pulling the assembly apart as it heats, creep in the plastic relieving clamping force, potential glass transition softening at the upper service limit. Any of these can cause the assembly to fail even though no material was individually overstressed.

Material-selection FAQ

How do I choose between cast and wrought for aluminum?
Cast aluminum (A356, A380) is for complex geometries that would be expensive to machine from solid. Wrought aluminum (6061, 7075) is for CNC machining or structural applications. Cast has ~50-70% the strength of wrought equivalents; design accordingly. Never substitute one for the other based on appearance — the mechanical differences are substantial.
Why does my CNC shop charge different rates for different materials?
Beyond material cost, machining time differs dramatically. Aluminum machines at 500+ SFM. Stainless at 80-120 SFM. Titanium at 30-50 SFM. Inconel at 20-40 SFM. A part that takes 15 minutes in aluminum takes 75+ minutes in Inconel — the machine time cost dominates.
What material should I pick for "maximum strength"?
Depends on the type of strength. Tensile ultimate: hardened tool steel (1500 MPa+). Yield at low weight: maraging steels (2000+ MPa). Strength-to-weight for structure: titanium Ti-6Al-4V (1070 MPa at density 4.43 g/cm³). Strength at elevated temperature: Inconel 718 (to 700°C). "Strength" without context is unanswerable.

Need help narrowing the choice?

Send us your use case — load, environment, target cost. We'll propose 1–2 materials with a cost comparison.

Ask for a recommendation